Stop Buying Logos. Start Building Systems
Is Your Sports Sponsorship Strategy Is Backwards?
When Revolut announced their Audi F1 title partnership in July 2025, everyone saw the logo.
Nobody saw the system.
Because buried in the press release—between the boilerplate about “global reach” and “innovative partnership”—was evidence of a sponsorship playbook most CMOs have never seen. Not because it’s secret. Because it requires discipline most brands don’t have.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: sports sponsorship fails because brands treat it like logo placement instead of strategic architecture.
Revolut built theirs with five deliberate steps. Miss even one, and you’re just buying expensive air time.
Step 1: Narrative Alignment (Not Demographic Targeting)
Most brands start with a spreadsheet. “Their fans are 18-45, affluent, our target demo. Let’s do it.”
Wrong starting point.
Ask yourself: What story is this property telling? Does that story reinforce or contradict yours?
Revolut started with narrative. “We’re a challenger disrupting traditional banking. Who else is challenging their industry’s incumbents?”
Answer: Audi entering F1 as a manufacturer in 2026, building an engine from scratch, taking on Mercedes and Ferrari who’ve been there for decades.
Same story. Different industry.
Antoine Le Nel, Revolut’s CMO, made this explicit: “Audi represents accessible luxury—premium but relatable. Not Ferrari’s distant mystique. That’s exactly who we are.”
This is why Revolut rejected bigger, more successful teams. They didn’t want to sponsor dominance. They wanted to sponsor becoming dominant.
If your brand is about heritage and stability, don’t sponsor an upstart league.
If your brand is about disruption, don’t sponsor the Yankees.
Narrative mismatch kills more sponsorships than bad activation.
Step 2: Visual Coherence
Le Nel explicitly criticized HP’s Ferrari sponsorship: “Blue branding on a red car.”
It’s not aesthetic snobbery. It’s strategic failure.
When your visual identity clashes with the property, every impression reinforces discord, not association. The brain sees “that doesn’t belong” instead of “those fit together.”
Here’s your test: Pull up their visual identity. Drop your logo on their jersey, car, or court in Canva. Show it to someone who doesn’t know the context.
Do they say “that looks right” or “that looks weird”?
If they squint, you’re paying to look like a mistake.
Revolut chose Audi partly because the color schemes work. Silver, black, red meeting black, blue, white. Visual harmony.
Compare: Mastercard on McLaren’s papaya orange creates iconic contrast that feels designed. HP on Ferrari red creates clash that feels accidental.
The principle: Your brand on their asset should look like it was always meant to be there—either through complementary colors or intentional, branded contrast.
Step 3: Geographic Strategy (The Arbitrage Question)
Here’s where most brands bleed money.
Stop. Before you calculate reach, answer this: Are you actually operating in those markets? Actually selling there? Or just hoping to someday?
Revolut operates in 39 countries. F1’s calendar hits virtually every market they care about: UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, US, Brazil, Mexico, Singapore, Japan.
One contract. Twenty markets.
Try buying equivalent reach via separate TV campaigns in 20 countries. The math isn’t even close.
The arbitrage unlock: Global properties are underpriced if and only if you’re genuinely global.
But here’s the trap: If you’re a UK-focused brand paying for global reach, you’re subsidizing F1’s Australian and Saudi audiences you don’t need.
Revolut’s Como 1907 partnership shows the inverse. It’s a boutique Italian club—tiny reach, but perfect for their Italy expansion strategy. They want that specific market depth.
Your framework:
Map the property’s geographic footprint against your revenue by market. If overlap is under 50%, you’re paying for waste.
The solution? Pair one global flagship (efficient reach) with 2-3 local anchors (deep relevance in growth markets).
That’s Revolut’s barbell: F1 + Como + Stade Toulousain + Man City Women.
Never spend your entire budget on pure global or pure local. You need both ends.
Step 4: Integration Depth (Beyond the Logo)
Most sponsorships stop at visibility. Sophisticated ones move to infrastructure.
Revolut isn’t just appearing on the Audi F1 car. From the press release: “Revolut Business will be extensively integrated into the team’s financial operations.”
Translation: They’re running the team’s payroll, cross-border payments, FX, merchant acquiring.
An F1 team is a multinational business operating in 20+ countries with cost-cap reporting requirements. It’s basically a complex SME with logistics-level operations.
If Revolut can handle that, every CFO watching knows they can handle their business.
The integration ladder:
Level 1: Logo placement → Awareness only
Level 2: Hospitality/content → Relationship building
Level 3: Fan-facing tech → Payments, apps, ticketing
Level 4: Backend infrastructure → You run their operations
Level 5: Mission-critical → They can’t function without you
Oracle with Red Bull Racing is Level 5 (race strategy simulations). AWS with F1 is Level 5 (broadcast data infrastructure). Revolut is targeting Level 4.
Here’s your decision point:
Map your product against this ladder. If you can’t reach Level 3 or higher, you’re overpaying for a logo.
CPG brands selling energy drinks? Level 1-2 is fine.
Fintech, SaaS, payments, cloud? If you’re stuck at Level 1, you might as well redirect budget to performance marketing.
The higher you climb, the more the sponsorship becomes a revenue enabler instead of a cost center.
What level can your product realistically achieve?
Step 5: Portfolio Architecture (The Death Zone)
The final step is the hardest: knowing what not to buy.
Revolut has six sports partnerships. But notice the distribution:
REVOLUT'S BARBELL PORTFOLIO
Global Flagship (40-50%)
├─ Audi F1
├─ Mass awareness engine
├─ Investor credibility signal
└─ Geographic efficiency across 100+ markets
Regional Anchors (30-40%)
├─ NBA Europe, Como 1907, Man City Women
├─ Market-specific cultural depth
├─ Community relevance
└─ Focused activation opportunity
Niche Plays (10-20%)
├─ Stade Toulousain (rugby), BLAST (esports)
├─ Demographic precision
├─ Category ownership potential
└─ Experimental learning
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[THE DEATH ZONE]
Mid-tier deals: Avoid entirely
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
What they don’t have: A dozen mid-tier deals.
The Death Zone theory: Sponsorships in the mid-tier range are where brands go to die.
Why? You spend enough to hurt the P&L but not enough to dominate share of voice. You get drowned out by the category leader who spent 3x more. You lack budget to activate properly (keep in mind the industry best practice: spend $1.50 on activation for every $1 on rights).
You’re just expensive wallpaper.
The evidence:
Cazoo spent massive sums across Everton, Aston Villa, Marseille, Valencia, The Hundred cricket, snooker, darts. Massive reach. Zero depth. Entered administration in 2024.
TeamViewer invested heavily in Manchester United’s front-of-shirt. Shareholders revolted. Early exit. Wrong audience, wrong integration level.
The barbell principle:
Go very big (one flagship that signals “we’re major league”) OR very small (hyper-targeted where you can own the category).
Avoid the middle.
How this scales:
The barbell works at any budget level:
Large budgets: One major flagship + multiple regional anchors + experimental bets
Medium budgets: Skip the global flagship entirely. Go deep in 1-2 regional markets.
Small budgets: Don’t touch major properties. Own niche categories or do athlete deals.
The principle stays constant: dominant at the extremes, absent in the middle.
Can you afford to dominate your tier? If not, drop down a tier or walk away.
The Discipline Question
These five steps aren’t complicated. They’re disciplined.
Which is why most brands fail them.
Step 1 requires saying no to properties with great demos but wrong narratives.
Step 2 requires admitting your logo doesn’t look good everywhere.
Step 3 requires walking away from “prestigious” deals that don’t match your footprint.
Step 4 requires product teams to collaborate on integration (most won’t).
Step 5 requires resisting the CEO’s favorite team if it’s in the Death Zone.
Revolut did all five. Not because they’re smarter. Because they had a framework and stuck to it.
Your next move:
Pull your current sports partnerships (or the ones you’re considering).
Run them through these five steps.
Score each: Pass or Fail.
If you fail more than one step, you’re not sponsoring strategically. You’re subsidizing someone else’s Sunday afternoon.
The fix isn’t complicated. It just requires courage.
One Last Thing
Most brands sponsor sports because everyone else does. Because the CEO loves the team. Because “we need to be there.”
Revolut sponsored sports because they built a system that told them exactly where to be.
The difference?
One approach burns budget trying to prove it worked.
The other builds a machine that compounds year after year.
Your move.
(Credit and Thank You's go to the Business of Sport podcast for inspiring this post)
Thanks for reading The Ballketing Letter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
If you find this valuable, it would be amazing if you shared it with someone: